<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foift.org/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foift.org</link>
	<description>Protecting the Public&#039;s Right to Know Since 1978</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Political Payback or Open Records Violation? by Terry Combs</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?p=835&#038;cpage=1#comment-6056</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Combs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/?p=835#comment-6056</guid>
		<description>Not unusual for an official to claim a document is protected due to an &quot;ongoing&quot; criminal investigation. Sometimes long after such an &quot;investigation&quot; is over (or in a case I am familiar with has moved to a civil court over a contract dispute wherein theft was alleged in order to force a resolution over possession of property). Often wondered if there was/is a way to give the offending official the proper &quot;comeuppance&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not unusual for an official to claim a document is protected due to an &#8220;ongoing&#8221; criminal investigation. Sometimes long after such an &#8220;investigation&#8221; is over (or in a case I am familiar with has moved to a civil court over a contract dispute wherein theft was alleged in order to force a resolution over possession of property). Often wondered if there was/is a way to give the offending official the proper &#8220;comeuppance&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Government Seminar 2010 by Open Government Seminar September 9, 2010 &#8211; My Harlingen News</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?page_id=98&#038;cpage=1#comment-5733</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Government Seminar September 9, 2010 &#8211; My Harlingen News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/NewFOIFT/wordpress/?page_id=98#comment-5733</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.foift.org/index.php?page_id=98 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.foift.org/index.php?page_id=98" rel="nofollow">http://www.foift.org/index.php?page_id=98</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Georgetown City Council Should Demand Answers and Repayment ! by Jane Leatherman Van Praag</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?p=802&#038;cpage=1#comment-5633</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Leatherman Van Praag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/?p=802#comment-5633</guid>
		<description>Absolutely members of the Goergetown City Council should be furious along with all the Georgetown citizens and everybody else who lives in the county!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely members of the Goergetown City Council should be furious along with all the Georgetown citizens and everybody else who lives in the county!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FOI Letter by Stop Texas Set Asides &#124; Blog &#124; Sample Open Records Request</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?page_id=8&#038;cpage=1#comment-4705</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop Texas Set Asides &#124; Blog &#124; Sample Open Records Request</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/NewFOIFT/wordpress/?page_id=8#comment-4705</guid>
		<description>[...] can find more sample Open Record Requests at http://www.foift.org/?page_id=8.   var a2a_config = a2a_config &#124;&#124; {}; a2a_config.linkname=&quot;Sample Open Records Request&quot;; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can find more sample Open Record Requests at <a href="http://www.foift.org/?page_id=8" rel="nofollow">http://www.foift.org/?page_id=8</a>.   var a2a_config = a2a_config || {}; a2a_config.linkname=&quot;Sample Open Records Request&quot;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FOIFT Supports Tx Attorney General&#8217;s Defense of Tx Open Meetings Act by chuck lee</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?p=691&#038;cpage=1#comment-4700</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/?p=691#comment-4700</guid>
		<description>City Attorney: City commissioners did not violate Open Meetings Act
July 14, 2010
By JERRY DEAL

Contrary to reports being circulated about the city, the three city commissioners who attended a joint meeting with the Economic Development Board did not violate the Texas Open Meetings Act, according to City Attorney Roxan Pais Cotroneo.
The reports had claimed that commissioners Jerry Prepechal, Kori Marra and Robert Leftwich were a quorum, so because the meeting was not posted, they had violated the Open Meetings law.
Cotroneo explained that under Texas law, a quorum means a majority of members, unless defined differently by charter of the governmental body.
“Pursuant to Article V, Section 1 of the Harlingen City Charter, three city commissioners and a presiding mayor or mayor pro tem constitute a quorum,” she said.
“Neither the mayor nor the mayor pro tem were present so there was no quorum, so there was no violation of the Open Meetings Act.”
Cotroneo, who also was at the meeting, held at the Harlingen Area Chamber of Commerce building, added, “If I knew or believed there was a violation, I would have immediately stopped the meeting.”
She said a notice of the meeting was posted on the front bulletin board at City Hall, but that City Secretary Sylvia Trevino forgot to post it on the internet.
“But, because there was no quorum, no violation,” she concluded.

City Commissioners Did Violate Open Meetings Act!
July 14, 2010
By Chuck Lee

I take the opposite position.  I believe the 3 city commissioners in attendance were a quorum at the EDC bonifide meeting and violated the Texas Open Meetings Act.

If Harlingen City Attorney Roxann Cotroneo’s interpretation of the Harlingen City Charter mentioned below is valid, then 3 or 4 city commissioners can meet at will, discuss city business, and decide how to vote on city business at will without repercussions, as long as the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem is not present during their meetings. 

This sets a dangerous precedent for city government and will not stand. The City Charter must line up and comply with the State of Texas Constitution and State Statutes. They take precedent over city law.

“This aggression will not stand man.”  The Dude, in the cult classic movie, “The Big Labowski”


No posting of an “Attendance and Participation” meeting on City of Harlingen Website in the event a quorum of city commissioners is present at EDC July 13, 2010 meetings:
http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=citycommission.agendas.2010

No posting of any meeting for July 13, 2010 on City of Harlingen Website:
http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=citycommission.agendas.2010

A posting of the EDC meetings for July 13, 2010 on City of Harlingen Website:
http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=devcorps.agenda.2010
 
Harlingen City Charter 

ARTICLE V. LEGISLATION (ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS)

SECTION 1. MEETINGS OF CITY COMMISSION. The City Commissioner shall meet at such time as may be prescribed by the ordinance or resolution, but at least once a month. The Mayor, any two City Commissioners or the City Manager (hereinafter provided for) may call special meetings of the City Commission at any time deemed advisable. The City Commission shall establish by ordinance how an item may be placed on the agenda. All meetings of the City Commission shall be public except such executive sessions as may be provided for by law, and any citizen shall have access to the minutes and records of meetings at all reasonable times in accordance with the Open Meetings Act, the Public Information Act and/or any other applicable laws, all as may be amended in the future. The City Commission shall determine its own rules and order of business and shall keep a journal of its proceedings. However, if the City Commission has not determined its own rules and order of business for any matter, then parliamentary procedures shall be followed in accordance with Robert’s Rules of Order. (Res. 79-R-7, passed 2-24-79)

SECTION 2. LEGISLATIVE AND BUSINESS PROCEDURE. Three (3) City Commissioners and a presiding Mayor or Mayor Pro tempore shall constitute a quorum to do business. The City Commission shall conduct its business by adoption or rejection of ordinances or resolutions or motions. (Ord. 73-30, passed 11-7-73)

Notice Requirements
Texas Local Government Code

§ 551.050. Municipal Governmental Body: Place of Posting Notice A municipal governmental body shall post notice of each meeting on a bulletin board at a place convenient to the public in the city hall.

§ 551.056. Additional Posting Requirements for Certain Municipalities, Counties, School Districts, Junior College Districts, and Development Corporations

Section 551.056 requires certain governmental bodies and economic development corporations to post notice on their Internet Web sites, in addition to other postings required by the Act. This provision applies to the following entities, if the entity maintains an Internet Web site or has a Web site maintained for it:
(1) a municipality;
(2) a county;
(3) a school district; 
(4) the governing body of a junior college or junior college district, including a
college or district that has changed its name in accordance with Chapter 130, Education Code; and
(5) a development corporation organized under the Development Corporation
Act (Subtitle C1, Title 12, Local Government Code).
(6) a regional mobility authority included within the meaning of an “authority” as defined by Section 370.003, Transportation Code.
If a covered municipality’s population is 48,000 or more and a county’s population is 65,000 or more, it must also post the agenda for the meeting on its Web site.
(c) The following governmental bodies and economic development corporations must also
concurrently post the agenda for the meeting on the Internet website of the governmental body or economic development corporation:
(1) a municipality with a population of 48,000 or more;
(2) a county with a population of 65,000 or more;
(3) a school district that contains all or part of the area within the corporate boundaries of a
municipality with a population of 48,000 or more;
(4) the governing body of a junior college district, including a district that has changed its name in accordance with Chapter 130, Education Code, that contains all or part of the area within the corporate boundaries of a municipality with a population of 48,000 or more;
(5) a development corporation organized under the Development Corporation A ct (Subtitle C1, Title 12, Local Government Code)
that was created by or for:
(A) a municipality with a population of 48,000 or more

Sections 551.143 and 551.144 of the Government Code establish criminal sanctions for certain conduct that violates openness requirements. A member of a governmental body must be found to have acted “knowingly” to be found guilty of either of these offenses. Section 551.143 provides as follows:
(a) A member or group of members of a governmental body commits an offense if the member or group of members knowingly conspires to circumvent this chapter by meeting in numbers less than a quorum for the purpose of secret deliberations in violation of this chapter.`
(b) An offense under Subsection (a) is a misdemeanor punishable by:
(1) a fine of not less than $100 or more than $500; (2) confinement in the county jail for not less than one month or more than six
months; or (3) both the fine and confinement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>City Attorney: City commissioners did not violate Open Meetings Act<br />
July 14, 2010<br />
By JERRY DEAL</p>
<p>Contrary to reports being circulated about the city, the three city commissioners who attended a joint meeting with the Economic Development Board did not violate the Texas Open Meetings Act, according to City Attorney Roxan Pais Cotroneo.<br />
The reports had claimed that commissioners Jerry Prepechal, Kori Marra and Robert Leftwich were a quorum, so because the meeting was not posted, they had violated the Open Meetings law.<br />
Cotroneo explained that under Texas law, a quorum means a majority of members, unless defined differently by charter of the governmental body.<br />
“Pursuant to Article V, Section 1 of the Harlingen City Charter, three city commissioners and a presiding mayor or mayor pro tem constitute a quorum,” she said.<br />
“Neither the mayor nor the mayor pro tem were present so there was no quorum, so there was no violation of the Open Meetings Act.”<br />
Cotroneo, who also was at the meeting, held at the Harlingen Area Chamber of Commerce building, added, “If I knew or believed there was a violation, I would have immediately stopped the meeting.”<br />
She said a notice of the meeting was posted on the front bulletin board at City Hall, but that City Secretary Sylvia Trevino forgot to post it on the internet.<br />
“But, because there was no quorum, no violation,” she concluded.</p>
<p>City Commissioners Did Violate Open Meetings Act!<br />
July 14, 2010<br />
By Chuck Lee</p>
<p>I take the opposite position.  I believe the 3 city commissioners in attendance were a quorum at the EDC bonifide meeting and violated the Texas Open Meetings Act.</p>
<p>If Harlingen City Attorney Roxann Cotroneo’s interpretation of the Harlingen City Charter mentioned below is valid, then 3 or 4 city commissioners can meet at will, discuss city business, and decide how to vote on city business at will without repercussions, as long as the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem is not present during their meetings. </p>
<p>This sets a dangerous precedent for city government and will not stand. The City Charter must line up and comply with the State of Texas Constitution and State Statutes. They take precedent over city law.</p>
<p>“This aggression will not stand man.”  The Dude, in the cult classic movie, “The Big Labowski”</p>
<p>No posting of an “Attendance and Participation” meeting on City of Harlingen Website in the event a quorum of city commissioners is present at EDC July 13, 2010 meetings:<br />
<a href="http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=citycommission.agendas.2010" rel="nofollow">http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=citycommission.agendas.2010</a></p>
<p>No posting of any meeting for July 13, 2010 on City of Harlingen Website:<br />
<a href="http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=citycommission.agendas.2010" rel="nofollow">http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=citycommission.agendas.2010</a></p>
<p>A posting of the EDC meetings for July 13, 2010 on City of Harlingen Website:<br />
<a href="http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=devcorps.agenda.2010" rel="nofollow">http://www.myharlingen.us/default.aspx?name=devcorps.agenda.2010</a></p>
<p>Harlingen City Charter </p>
<p>ARTICLE V. LEGISLATION (ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS)</p>
<p>SECTION 1. MEETINGS OF CITY COMMISSION. The City Commissioner shall meet at such time as may be prescribed by the ordinance or resolution, but at least once a month. The Mayor, any two City Commissioners or the City Manager (hereinafter provided for) may call special meetings of the City Commission at any time deemed advisable. The City Commission shall establish by ordinance how an item may be placed on the agenda. All meetings of the City Commission shall be public except such executive sessions as may be provided for by law, and any citizen shall have access to the minutes and records of meetings at all reasonable times in accordance with the Open Meetings Act, the Public Information Act and/or any other applicable laws, all as may be amended in the future. The City Commission shall determine its own rules and order of business and shall keep a journal of its proceedings. However, if the City Commission has not determined its own rules and order of business for any matter, then parliamentary procedures shall be followed in accordance with Robert’s Rules of Order. (Res. 79-R-7, passed 2-24-79)</p>
<p>SECTION 2. LEGISLATIVE AND BUSINESS PROCEDURE. Three (3) City Commissioners and a presiding Mayor or Mayor Pro tempore shall constitute a quorum to do business. The City Commission shall conduct its business by adoption or rejection of ordinances or resolutions or motions. (Ord. 73-30, passed 11-7-73)</p>
<p>Notice Requirements<br />
Texas Local Government Code</p>
<p>§ 551.050. Municipal Governmental Body: Place of Posting Notice A municipal governmental body shall post notice of each meeting on a bulletin board at a place convenient to the public in the city hall.</p>
<p>§ 551.056. Additional Posting Requirements for Certain Municipalities, Counties, School Districts, Junior College Districts, and Development Corporations</p>
<p>Section 551.056 requires certain governmental bodies and economic development corporations to post notice on their Internet Web sites, in addition to other postings required by the Act. This provision applies to the following entities, if the entity maintains an Internet Web site or has a Web site maintained for it:<br />
(1) a municipality;<br />
(2) a county;<br />
(3) a school district;<br />
(4) the governing body of a junior college or junior college district, including a<br />
college or district that has changed its name in accordance with Chapter 130, Education Code; and<br />
(5) a development corporation organized under the Development Corporation<br />
Act (Subtitle C1, Title 12, Local Government Code).<br />
(6) a regional mobility authority included within the meaning of an “authority” as defined by Section 370.003, Transportation Code.<br />
If a covered municipality’s population is 48,000 or more and a county’s population is 65,000 or more, it must also post the agenda for the meeting on its Web site.<br />
(c) The following governmental bodies and economic development corporations must also<br />
concurrently post the agenda for the meeting on the Internet website of the governmental body or economic development corporation:<br />
(1) a municipality with a population of 48,000 or more;<br />
(2) a county with a population of 65,000 or more;<br />
(3) a school district that contains all or part of the area within the corporate boundaries of a<br />
municipality with a population of 48,000 or more;<br />
(4) the governing body of a junior college district, including a district that has changed its name in accordance with Chapter 130, Education Code, that contains all or part of the area within the corporate boundaries of a municipality with a population of 48,000 or more;<br />
(5) a development corporation organized under the Development Corporation A ct (Subtitle C1, Title 12, Local Government Code)<br />
that was created by or for:<br />
(A) a municipality with a population of 48,000 or more</p>
<p>Sections 551.143 and 551.144 of the Government Code establish criminal sanctions for certain conduct that violates openness requirements. A member of a governmental body must be found to have acted “knowingly” to be found guilty of either of these offenses. Section 551.143 provides as follows:<br />
(a) A member or group of members of a governmental body commits an offense if the member or group of members knowingly conspires to circumvent this chapter by meeting in numbers less than a quorum for the purpose of secret deliberations in violation of this chapter.`<br />
(b) An offense under Subsection (a) is a misdemeanor punishable by:<br />
(1) a fine of not less than $100 or more than $500; (2) confinement in the county jail for not less than one month or more than six<br />
months; or (3) both the fine and confinement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bexar County Taxpayers Should Fight Back ! by Lisa A Cromwell</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?p=609&#038;cpage=1#comment-4443</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa A Cromwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/?p=609#comment-4443</guid>
		<description>Open Government does not mean conduct business secretely! Cough up the emails where county business was mentioned! What does he have to loose, if he has nothing to hide? 
There should be no county business discussed that is private!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Government does not mean conduct business secretely! Cough up the emails where county business was mentioned! What does he have to loose, if he has nothing to hide?<br />
There should be no county business discussed that is private!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thanks for Standing Up In Support of the Law ! by G J</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?p=619&#038;cpage=1#comment-4409</link>
		<dc:creator>G J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/?p=619#comment-4409</guid>
		<description>Where does privacy start and end.
The assumption that County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson should give anyone access to his private emails is ridiculous. The tax payers DO NOT pay for his private email account. From my understanding the account that the Express News is requesting access to is a Hotmail, AOL or GMAIL account. Hotmail and AOL are paid accounts and have NOTHING to do with his county business and are not the property of the people of Texas. Why does the Express News assume that there is anything of relevance in his private email accounts?

The emails sent from his personal email account are private.

I understand that we are going through a time when we are being led not to trust our public officials, but we should trust them. I can make a case that the Express-News is requesting these emails because they know that a paper or a website with TOMMY&#039;s name on it sells papers. We are in a time where firestorm media rules and accusations and innuendo matter more than facts or even common sense.

I can tell you for a fact that you cannot trust what you read or see in the Media. Let&#039;s play a game… we will call it where in the world is Tommy Adkisson? Take a look at this picture from an event a few weeks ago
http://media.mysanantonio.com/images/BILL-WHITE-650.jpg. I was at that event and Tommy was standing over Bill White&#039;s left shoulder then entire event.
I thought something looked weird so I looked at Tommy&#039;s facebook pictures http://facebook.com/electtommyadkisson or Tommy&#039;s website http://tommyadkisson.com/photos/view/24.html and in all comparable pictures Tommy is there.

So where in the world was Tommy Adkisson? Can you say photoshop? Where is the journalistic integrity of the Express News? Why turn over PRIVATE emails? Can we trust the Express News?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does privacy start and end.<br />
The assumption that County Commissioner Tommy Adkisson should give anyone access to his private emails is ridiculous. The tax payers DO NOT pay for his private email account. From my understanding the account that the Express News is requesting access to is a Hotmail, AOL or GMAIL account. Hotmail and AOL are paid accounts and have NOTHING to do with his county business and are not the property of the people of Texas. Why does the Express News assume that there is anything of relevance in his private email accounts?</p>
<p>The emails sent from his personal email account are private.</p>
<p>I understand that we are going through a time when we are being led not to trust our public officials, but we should trust them. I can make a case that the Express-News is requesting these emails because they know that a paper or a website with TOMMY&#8217;s name on it sells papers. We are in a time where firestorm media rules and accusations and innuendo matter more than facts or even common sense.</p>
<p>I can tell you for a fact that you cannot trust what you read or see in the Media. Let&#8217;s play a game… we will call it where in the world is Tommy Adkisson? Take a look at this picture from an event a few weeks ago<br />
<a href="http://media.mysanantonio.com/images/BILL-WHITE-650.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://media.mysanantonio.com/images/BILL-WHITE-650.jpg</a>. I was at that event and Tommy was standing over Bill White&#8217;s left shoulder then entire event.<br />
I thought something looked weird so I looked at Tommy&#8217;s facebook pictures <a href="http://facebook.com/electtommyadkisson" rel="nofollow">http://facebook.com/electtommyadkisson</a> or Tommy&#8217;s website <a href="http://tommyadkisson.com/photos/view/24.html" rel="nofollow">http://tommyadkisson.com/photos/view/24.html</a> and in all comparable pictures Tommy is there.</p>
<p>So where in the world was Tommy Adkisson? Can you say photoshop? Where is the journalistic integrity of the Express News? Why turn over PRIVATE emails? Can we trust the Express News?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Got an APP for that, too ! by Christian Louboutin pumps shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-4372</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Louboutin pumps shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/?p=329#comment-4372</guid>
		<description>It’s worth remembering this one indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s worth remembering this one indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bexar County Taxpayers Should Fight Back ! by G J</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?p=609&#038;cpage=1#comment-4333</link>
		<dc:creator>G J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/?p=609#comment-4333</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that this online news source will moderate comments. So how do we ever know the truth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that this online news source will moderate comments. So how do we ever know the truth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bexar County Taxpayers Should Fight Back ! by G J</title>
		<link>http://www.foift.org/?p=609&#038;cpage=1#comment-4332</link>
		<dc:creator>G J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foift.org/?p=609#comment-4332</guid>
		<description>I believe in protecting the public&#039;s right to know. However I do not believe that the private correspondence should be a part of public information. 
If I thought for a minute that the Express News would practice journalistic integrity and and treat Commissioner Adkisson with respect and honest reporting then by all means turn over all emails. We all know that the Express News and other organizations care more about making money off salacious stories than doing true reporting.

Bottom line, just because you are a public official does not mean you do not have a right to your privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in protecting the public&#8217;s right to know. However I do not believe that the private correspondence should be a part of public information.<br />
If I thought for a minute that the Express News would practice journalistic integrity and and treat Commissioner Adkisson with respect and honest reporting then by all means turn over all emails. We all know that the Express News and other organizations care more about making money off salacious stories than doing true reporting.</p>
<p>Bottom line, just because you are a public official does not mean you do not have a right to your privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
